About This Site
Powers and Fractions
Notes About Squares
> Decimal Expansions
Repeat Length Again
Intrinsic Nature of Primes
Other Topics (2)
Expansion CalculatorI like computing things. Most of the fractions you see around here—the common ones, the larger ones, and the common ones in base 2—I worked out by hand at one time. This time, though, I got lazy and wrote some code to do it for me.
It was surprisingly simple, actually. Here's the interesting part, which fills the array q with the expansion of m/n in base b.
int a = m;
Since I'm a bug for names, I'd like to point out that the letters “q” and “r” stand for “quotient” and “remainder”, and also that the letter “a” stands for the slightly less obvious “accumulator”.
Since I was thinking about hexadecimal, I set up the output code to handle it, producing the digits A–F for the quotient values 10–15. But then I figured, why stop there? So, I put in the whole alphabet, allowing me to work in any base up to base 36.
Then, naturally, with that many letters around, I had to start looking for words. That was pointless, I knew—you can find patterns in any kind of random (or pseudorandom) noise, if you look at enough of it. Still, it was fun for a while.
The best ones I found were in base 36 itself. That was a surprise—I had figured I'd be better off without, say, X, Y, and Z. Anyway, there were two that I really liked. One was short and to the point: 1/74 (in decimal) has expansion 0.0HI. And one was the following little gem.
1/47 = 0.0RKOIDSC96W64LG32AQ1J5D
What's really funny is, the expansion, like the expansion of 1/7 in decimal, shows up in other expansions in various rotated forms (see Fractions for more detail). So, the D at the end usually comes up to the front, and you get … D0RKOIDS!
After that, there's a strange interleaved sequence of letters and multiples of 32.
Even the rest of the expansion is sort of interesting. The A, Q, and J remind me of cards, and the thing as a whole looks like a license plate number.
I thought maybe I'd have better luck if I removed the numbers and worked in base 26, but I tried that, and nothing jumped out at me.
Speaking of bases, and of things where the digit A has value 0, that reminds me of something else I like. When you send a file via email, the raw bytes have to be converted into printable characters; one common way of doing that is known as base 64 encoding. The process is actually very simple. Bytes are like digits in base 256, so it's just as easy to translate them into base 64 as it is to translate hexadecimal into octal; the only question is, which characters should be used to represent which digits? Here's the standard answer.
0123 4567 89AB CDEF
It would be more natural to have the table map to octal, but what can I say, I like hexadecimal.
Finally, speaking of numbers being words, see also Speedtalk.
In Other Bases
@ April (2004)